EUMR Issue Update – OIES Paper

OIES | Maria Olczak | June 2026
How Is the EU Methane Emissions Regulation Implemented in Practice?

The EU Methane Emissions Regulation (MER), in force since August 2024, establishes a framework for monitoring, reporting, and verification of methane emissions from fossil fuel imports, with a methane intensity standard for imports phasing in by 2030. While adopted at EU level, implementation is decentralized—placing primary responsibility on 27 Member States and their newly designated Competent Authorities (CAs). Olczak draws on interviews with CAs and responsible ministries in Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy to assess early implementation experience. Collectively those three countries account for 46% of EU-27 natural gas imports from third countries.

Three findings frame the paper. First, implementation has become highly politicized, which may cause delays but is unlikely to derail the regulation altogether. Second, a persistent tension exists between Member States’ preference for regulatory flexibility and importers’ need for legal certainty—particularly on penalty design and compliance solutions for complex supply chains. Third, MER implementation requires significant adjustments to existing regulatory practice, especially regarding the verification of emissions in third countries where CAs have no enforcement jurisdiction.

The Netherlands’ Dutch Emissions Authority (NEa) is the best-prepared CA in the study—yet even it cannot deploy supervisory powers against non-EU producers and is uncertain whether it can access underlying verification documentation. On book-and-claim: CAs do not regard the Energy Council’s December 2025 endorsement of MiQ-style certification as formal legal approval of any specific scheme, and view current solutions as explicitly transitional. On penalties: only two of 27 Member States had finalized penalty regimes by the August 2025 deadline. CAs have signaled they will not impose penalties immediately even upon clear infringement. The combination of delayed regimes, discretionary enforcement, and cross-country divergence generates significant commercial uncertainty for importers who must price potential penalties into contracts now.

Download Full Paper →